A AcquireWire
Back to the Wire

Goldman and JPMorgan Posted Record Numbers. Their Stocks Fell Anyway.

Goldman hit its highest-ever equities trading quarter and JPMorgan earned $5.94 per share. Both beat estimates handily. Both stocks dropped on the day. The market is telling you it cares more about Iran than about earnings.

The Numbers

Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) reported Q1 2026 earnings of $17.55 per share on April 13, beating the $16.49 consensus by 6.6%. Revenue came in at $17.23 billion, up 14% year-over-year and the firm’s second-highest quarter ever. The standout was equities trading, which hit a record $5.33 billion in revenue (+27% YoY), driven by prime brokerage activity and elevated market volatility. Investment banking fees surged 48% to $2.84 billion on a wave of completed mergers. Advisory revenue nearly doubled, up 89% to $1.49 billion. Return on tangible common equity was 21.3%.

The miss was fixed income. FICC revenue fell 10% to $4.01 billion, roughly $910 million below estimates, with “significantly lower” revenues in interest rate products, mortgages, and credit. Provision for credit losses more than doubled to $315 million, the largest increase since 2020.

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) reported Q1 results on April 14. Earnings per share came in at $5.94, beating the $5.45 estimate by 8.2%. Revenue rose 10% to $50.54 billion. Net income climbed 13% to $16.49 billion. Markets revenue hit $11.6 billion (+20%), with fixed income up 21% to $7.08 billion on strength in commodities, credit, and emerging markets. Investment banking fees jumped 28% to $2.88 billion. CEO Jamie Dimon pointed to low-single-digit growth in discretionary card spending, describing the consumer as “intact, but not accelerating.” JPM lowered full-year net interest income guidance from $104.5 billion to approximately $103 billion.

What the Market Is Actually Saying

The beat-and-drop pattern is the story. Goldman fell 3% on its earnings day despite posting records. JPMorgan’s stock barely moved despite a clean beat on every line. In normal markets, these results would have sent both stocks up 3 to 5%. Instead, the reaction tells you that institutional investors are not pricing bank fundamentals right now. They are pricing the probability that the Iran ceasefire holds, that oil stays below $100, and that the Fed does not hike. Bank earnings are noise against that signal.

M&A is back, but bifurcated. Goldman’s 48% surge in IB fees and JPMorgan’s 28% increase confirm that the dealmaking renaissance is real. But David Solomon warned on the earnings call that the Iran conflict could push corporate clients to the sidelines. Advisory revenue was strong because Q1 deals closed before the war intensified. The pipeline is there. The question is whether it converts in Q2 if the geopolitical backdrop deteriorates.

Credit deterioration is showing up. Goldman’s loan loss provisions more than doubled. JPMorgan projects a Card Services net charge-off rate of 3.4%. Both banks are quietly building reserves for a consumer that the headline employment data says is fine but that the Michigan sentiment survey says is collapsing. The divergence between strong bank earnings and rising credit provisions is exactly the pattern you see before a turn.

What to Watch
  • FICC weakness: Goldman missed fixed income estimates by $910M. If rate volatility is hurting trading desks, Q2 could be worse as the Fed leans hawkish.
  • NII guidance cut: JPM lowered its full-year net interest income forecast. If other banks follow, the "higher for longer" rate thesis may not benefit banks as much as expected.
  • Credit provisions rising: Goldman's largest provision increase since 2020. Early signal of wholesale loan stress that could intensify if the war resumes.